When I was about twelve years old I developed an intense
interest in the back-end of wardrobes, but after checking a few and finding
nothing but wood-paneling I worried that there might not be anything there. With a sinking heart I opened hotel closets, pulled
aside my friends’ clothes when they were in the bathroom, and looked twice when
passing furniture stores because just maybe something might be mixed in amongst
the dressers and armoires that would open onto another world. Eventually, I got older and figured out that
the only such portal was in my head, but even after transmigration ceased being
a practical possibility the theoretical appeal never quite went away.
That, I
think, is where my fascination with Buddhist enlightenment came from: it gave me one last chance to board the train to fairy-land.
For what are looking like more and
more ho-hum reasons I wanted to think of the world as a mundane sheet drawn
over a sparkling second-life, but it’s clear now that no hole in the forest leads
to Redwall Abbey and no door in the mountainside to Minas Tirith. Bash up against every wall in every train
station in the world and you’ll still never make it onto Platform 9 and ¾. In such a methodical way my childhood
fantasies went one by one into the wood chipper of reality.
Enter Buddhism. Maybe Tatooine and Tar Valon and Midgaard are
all made-up, but Deer Park
is a real place and they say Siddhartha reached enlightenment there. What exactly does that feel like? How does it work? When you finally understand the sound of one hand
clapping, does the other one sweep out of the ethereal mists and pull back the
mythic curtain once and for all, revealing the glorious whatever-it-is that’s hiding
beneath?
I’d like to make the argument that
enlightenment is real, and you can reach it by following the eight-fold path,
but it doesn’t disclose a new world so much as it casts this one in a bit of a softer
light. Give me a few posts and maybe
you’ll admit I'm not crazy. I'll begin by showing that Buddhism (of which there are admittedly many forms) contains a stripped-down world-view based on a few simple logically inescapable premises that are perfectly compatible with scientific objectivism. From there, I'll define the optimal way of life as described by that world-view, and pursue it to the realization (awakening, enlightenment) awaiting if you follow it all the way to the end. I'll finish with a discussion of what that might be like, how to get there, and whether or not getting there is worth it. Amu Namida Butsu.
No comments:
Post a Comment